Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42459543›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2026

Beyond the clinical eye: mapping intestinal parasitic infections and its risk factors among dogs and cats across Portugal.

Bárbara Ferreira, Joana Ferrolho, Clarissa Faria, Olga Borges, Sérgio Sousa, Maria do Céu Sousa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Bárbara FerreiraFaculty of Pharmacy, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.
Joana FerrolhoCIVG-Vasco da Gama Research Center, EUVG-Vasco da Gama University School, Coimbra, Portugal.
Clarissa FariaFaculty of Pharmacy, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.
Olga BorgesFaculty of Pharmacy, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.
Sérgio SousaCIVG-Vasco da Gama Research Center, EUVG-Vasco da Gama University School, Coimbra, Portugal.
Maria do Céu SousaFaculty of Pharmacy, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Intestinal parasitic infections in dogs and cats represent a significant clinical challenge and pose relevant zoonotic risks to public health. Epidemiological data on Portuguese companion animals remain scarce, with limited sample sizes and geographic coverage, leaving key gaps in understanding parasite prevalence and associated risk factors. Methods: This cross-sectional epidemiological study investigated the prevalence and associated risk factors of intestinal parasitism in 363 dogs and 345 cats, sampled from companion, breeding, shelter, and stray populations between November 2022 and April 2025. A total of 708 fecal samples were analyzed using coprological techniques (flotation and sedimentation), Results: Overall, 41.6% of dogs were positive for intestinal parasites, with protozoa and monoparasitism (61.2%) predominating. Conclusion: Taken together, the detection of intestinal parasites in 41.6% of dogs and 42.6% of cats highlights a substantial burden, with parasites of zoonotic potential accounting for 73.9% of all positive results (295/399). These high rates point to critical gaps in preventive care among companion animal populations, underscoring the urgent need for strengthened surveillance, targeted treatment protocols, and enhanced public health education to reduce parasite burdens and mitigate zoonotic risks in Portugal.

Indexed as

AncylostomatidaeCryptosporidiumCystoisosporaGiardiaone healthprevalenceToxocarazoonosis

Identifiers

PMID42459543
PMCPMC13371433

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.