ArticleComputational brain & behavior2024
Reclaiming AI as a Theoretical Tool for Cognitive Science.
Article in Computational brain & behavior, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- Illusions of Understanding from Outsourcing Thinking to LLMs.Computational brain & behavior · 2026Article
- What Does 'Human-Centred AI' Mean?Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- LLMs displaying less cognitive bias are not necessarily better decision makers.Nature machine intelligence · 2026Article
- Article
- Computational modeling of rhythmic expectations: Perspectives, pitfalls, and prospects.PLoS computational biology · 2025Review
- Promises and perils of generative artificial intelligence: a narrative review informing its ethical and practical applications in clinical exercise physiology.BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation · 2025Review
- Zooming in on what counts as core and auxiliary: A case study on recognition models of visual working memory.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2025Review
- How to Design, Create, and Evaluate an Instruction-Tuning Dataset for Large Language Model Training in Health Care: Tutorial From a Clinical Perspective.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Virtues for AI.AI & society · 2025Article
- Article
- Becoming human in the age of AI: cognitive co-evolutionary processes.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
- Now is the time: operationalizing generative neurophenomenology through interpersonal methods.Neuroscience of consciousness · 2025Article
- From Empirical Problem-Solving to Theoretical Problem-Finding Perspectives on the Cognitive Sciences.Computational brain & behavior · 2024Article
- What Makes a Good Theory? Interdisciplinary Perspectives.Computational brain & behavior · 2024Article
- What Makes a Good Theory, and How Do We Make a Theory Good?Computational brain & behavior · 2024Article
- Testing AI on language comprehension tasks reveals insensitivity to underlying meaning.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- People, places, things and communities: expanding behaviour settings theory in the twenty-first century.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024Article
- Systematic testing of three Language Models reveals low language accuracy, absence of response stability, and a yes-response bias.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.