ArticleComputational brain & behavior2024
The Whys and Hows of Theory-Comparing Cognitive Science and Economics.
Article in Computational brain & behavior, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Given the ongoing debates about the replication crisis, theory crisis, and cooperation among disciplines in cognitive science, it is instructive to compare cognitive science with economics. The two fields face common challenges, most importantly in that both study complex, open systems. The strategies for facing these challenges, however, are quite different. Economics was long dominated by theory. Cognitive science takes a multidisciplinary approach, and despite its attendant diversity is dominated by psychology, which itself often neglects theory. I defend economics' use of theory, characterizing its formal modeling tradition as an effective divide-and-conquer strategy for understanding complex, open systems. I argue that theory and experimentation ideally support one another, making replicability less of an issue. I also discuss the appropriate level(s) of analysis in economics and cognitive science as products of the systems they study. Finally, I compare the two fields' very different community structures, treating economics as a cautionary tale and advocating pluralism.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.