Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42459517›Full record

ArticleComputational brain & behavior2024

An Integrated Computational Framework for the Neurobiology of Memory Based on the ACT-R Declarative Memory System.

Andrea Stocco, Patrick Rice, Robert Thomson, Briana Smith, Don Morrison, Christian Lebiere

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computational brain & behavior, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Andrea StoccoDepartment of Psychology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8919-3934
Patrick RiceDepartment of Psychology, Rice University, Houston, TX USA.
Robert ThomsonDepartment of Electrical Engineering & Computer Science, United States Military Academy, West Point, NY USA.
Briana SmithDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA USA.
Don MorrisonDepartment of Psychology, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA USA.
Christian LebiereDepartment of Psychology, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Memory is a complex process that spans multiple time-scales and stages, and, as expected, involves multiple brain regions. Traditionally, computational models of memory are either too abstract (Shiffrin & Steyvers, 1997) to be meaningfully connected to a biological substrate, or, when explicitly connected, are narrowly focused on one specific region and process (Blum & Abbott, 1996; Weber et al., 2017). By contrast, a comprehensive model of memory with a plausible neural interpretation would be extremely valuable to drive further research in memory function and dysfunction. In this paper, we attempt to fill in this gap by providing a detailed biological analysis of ACT-R's declarative memory system. This system, developed over four decades, has evolved into a consistent framework that describes how memories are formed, retrieved, forgotten, mistaken, and merged. Building on existing mappings between some components and their biological counterpart, as well as the existing literature, this paper provides a comprehensive view of how the framework's various computations map onto different brain regions, their network dynamics and functional connectivity, and biological structure. We also show that these mappings provide further insights and explanations for puzzling findings in the memory disorders literature. Finally, we outline the remaining gaps (such as the transition from episodic to semantic memory) and how they could be addressed by future research and modeling efforts.

Indexed as

ACT-RComputational modelEpisodic memoryForgettingHippocampusLong-term memoryPrefrontal cortexRetrievalSemantic memory

Identifiers

PMID42459517
PMCPMC13292821

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.