Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42459495›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2026

Understanding parental engagement in children and adolescents' myopia prevention and control: a push-pull-mooring framework approach.

Jing Yan, Xianfeng Hu, Xiaowan Chen, Xiaoyan Wu, Min Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jing YanAnhui Medical University, Hefei, China.
Xianfeng HuAnhui Medical University, Hefei, China.
Xiaowan ChenAnhui Medical University, Hefei, China.
Xiaoyan WuAnhui Medical University, Hefei, China.
Min LiAnhui Medical University, Hefei, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Successful endeavors in myopia prevention and control require parental participation. This study applied the Push-Pull-Mooring (PPM) framework to explore how push, pull, and mooring factors foster parents' willingness to engage in myopia prevention and control, and to examine the moderating role of information provision on the relationship between parental willingness and actual engagement. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted among parents of children and adolescents in the Yangtze River Delta region of China. A total of 996 participants completed a web-based self-administered questionnaire. Structural equation modeling and hierarchical regression were employed to investigate the determinants of parental willingness and actual engagement in myopia prevention and control. Results: Push factors, including perceived risk of myopia ( Conclusion: The PPM framework effectively explained the psychosocial determinants of parental engagement in myopia prevention and control. Peer influence and recognition of myopia prevention policies and campaigns were the strongest predictors of parental willingness, while prevention costs served as a key barrier. Parental willingness, in turn, was a strong predictor of actual engagement behavior. These findings suggest that policymakers should strengthen parental willingness through targeted campaigns that leverage peer influence, improve policy awareness, and reduce prevention-related costs through resource provision at the family level.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeMyopiaParent-Child RelationsParentsAdolescentAdultChildChinaCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleSurveys and Questionnairesmoderating effectsmyopia prevention and controlparentspush-pull-mooring frameworkwillingness to engage

Identifiers

PMID42459495
PMCPMC13368914

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.