SynthesisFrontiers in public health2026
Sex-based differences in ocular trauma: a systematic review with narrative synthesis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Ocular trauma is a major cause of preventable visual impairment and blindness worldwide. Although sex-based differences in ocular trauma have been reported, the evidence has not been comprehensively synthesized across mechanisms, injury patterns, severity, and outcomes. Methods: We conducted a systematic review with narrative synthesis of studies published between January 2000 and December 2025. A structured search was performed in PubMed/MEDLINE, and reference lists of eligible articles were manually screened for additional studies. Original human epidemiologic or clinical studies were eligible if they focused on ocular trauma and reported sex-disaggregated data or direct comparisons between males and females relevant to epidemiology, mechanism, injury pattern, severity, management, or outcome. Reviews, meta-analyses, editorials, letters, conference abstracts, case reports, and mechanistic or preclinical studies were excluded from the formal review. Owing to substantial heterogeneity, findings were synthesized narratively. Forty-seven primary human studies met the inclusion criteria. Results: Males consistently accounted for most ocular trauma cases and were more likely to sustain occupational, sports-related, penetrating, and open-globe injuries, including intraocular foreign bodies, with greater posterior segment involvement and poorer visual outcomes. Females were more commonly represented in domestic, fall-related, blunt, and violence-related injuries. Boys showed higher pediatric injury rates, whereas older women were more vulnerable to fall-related trauma. Conclusion: Ocular trauma shows clinically meaningful sex-based differences that may inform prevention, risk stratification, and patient management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.