ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Enhancing health system governance and citizen empowerment in Bhutan through the Bhutan Vaccine System (BVS): a mixed-methods study.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The Bhutan Vaccine System (BVS) was developed for the COVID-19 vaccination and later expanded to include influenza and HPV vaccinations. It represents a key national innovation in health system transformation, linking vaccination delivery with citizen engagement. This study assessed how the BVS strengthened vaccination monitoring, governance processes, and citizen empowerment in Bhutan. Methods: We used a convergent mixed-methods design integrating secondary analysis of BVS data with qualitative interviews. Quantitative data from the BVS were analysed by age, sex, and district. Qualitative data were drawn from 56 key informants comprising policymakers, health workers, and community members from six districts of Bhutan. Thematic analysis, guided by Potter and Brough's systemic capacity-building framework, identified enablers and barriers across performance, personal, workload, facility, and support capacities. Findings were integrated using a convergence framework to align quantitative trends with qualitative themes. Results: By December 2023, 91.6% of Bhutan's total population had received at least one COVID-19 vaccine dose, and 83.3% had received three or more doses. Policymakers and health workers reported that the BVS improved real-time monitoring, reduced administrative delays, and data visibility. Self-registration and downloadable digital certificate features of the BVS increased people's autonomy and trust. Key barriers included limited interoperability with other health-information systems, unreliable internet connectivity, reporting burdens, and insufficient user training and hardware. Conclusion: The BVS demonstrates how a digital platform can strengthen governance and empower citizens when integrated within primary health-care structures. Sustained investment in infrastructure, digital literacy, and interoperability will be critical to maintain these gains and to guide equitable digital-health governance across low and middle-income countries. Bhutan's experience offers practical lessons on how digital systems can advance both efficiency and equity in public health management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.