ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Analysis of current status of knowledge, attitudes, and influencing factors regarding chikungunya fever among medical staff in Chengdu, Sichuan province, China: a cross-sectional study.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Chikungunya (CHIK) is an emerging mosquito-borne disease with increasing importation risk in China. In non-endemic settings, delayed detection may facilitate local transmission, making healthcare workers' knowledge and attitudes critical for rapid response. Objective: To assess CHIK-related knowledge and attitudes among medical personnel in Chengdu, Sichuan Province, and identify factors associated with positive prevention attitudes. Methods: A cross-sectional, self-administered online survey was executed from July 30 to August 6, 2025, targeting medical workers across 20 healthcare institutions in Chengdu using the Wenjuanxing platform. The questionnaire gathered demographic information, CHIK-related training exposure (yes/no), and assessments of knowledge and attitudes. Knowledge was assessed using 15 items (range 0-15; 1 point awarded for each right response). Attitudes were evaluated using Likert-type items; a cumulative attitude score of ≥20 signified a favorable attitude. Group disparities were analyzed with Chi-square tests alongside suitable parametric and nonparametric assessments. Hierarchical logistic regression (Block 1: demographics/occupational characteristics; Block 2: training; Block 3: knowledge score) was employed to ascertain factors correlated with positive attitudes. Results: 1,092 questionnaires were included, yielding an effective response rate of 90.10%; 83.70% indicated they had received training relevant. The average knowledge score was 11.66 ± 2.15. Despite high performance in primary prevention and clinical management, significant deficiencies were noted in early detection and surveillance-related operational knowledge: merely 42.58% accurately interpreted the RT-PCR Ct criterion, 54.85% recognized suspected cases, 56.14% comprehended diagnostic criteria, and 59.80% were aware of the 24 h online reporting requirement. Knowledge scores were elevated among individuals with advanced education, physicians, tertiary hospital personnel, and those who had training ( Conclusion: Chengdu medical personnel demonstrated general CHIK knowledge and positive attitudes, yet significant operational gaps persist in early detection and reporting protocols. Training and knowledge are key determinants of favorable attitudes, highlighting the need for standardized, process-oriented training emphasizing diagnostic and reporting procedures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.