ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Association between frailty and breast cancer incidence and construction of a breast cancer prediction model based on machine learning.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The relationship between frailty and breast cancer (BC) has been scarcely investigated. This study aims to explore the association between frailty and BC and to develop a predictive model for BC risk based on the frailty index (FI). Methods: This study utilized data from subjects with recorded frailty assessments and BC diagnosis collected by the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey between 2003 and 2020. FI was assessed by 49 frailty indicators. Frailty was defined as FI > 0.20. First, logistic regression was used to analyze the link between frailty and BC. Subsequently, the dataset was divided into training and validation sets in a 7:3 ratio. Based on the training set, LASSO regression and 10-fold cross-validation were used to screen for the variables with the greatest predictive value. Then, the study built and evaluated eight machine learning (ML) models. Finally, SHapley Additive explanations was applied to interpret the best-performing model. Results: After data were excluded, a total of 4,473 patients were ultimately included. Logistic analysis revealed a positive correlation between FI and BC prevalence ( Conclusion: FI is positively correlated with the prevalence of BC. BC prediction model based on the attenuation index that this study developed and validated has high sensitivity, aids in early BC identification in frail individuals, and suggests that future studies refine its applicability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.