ReviewAIMS microbiology2026
Effects of cover cropping on orchard soil microbiomes: Mechanisms and perspectives.
Review in AIMS microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Targeted Recruitment of Cross-Kingdom Phosphate-Solubilizing Microbes Drives Asymmetric Rhizosphere Responses BetweenPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Orchards have long faced severe soil erosion, acidification of red soils, low nutrient-use efficiency, and frequent soil-borne diseases. Conventional clean tillage combined with intensive chemical inputs often fails to simultaneously improve fruit yield and quality while safeguarding orchard ecological security. Cover cropping (i.e., managed groundcover vegetation) introduces persistent surface plant cover and introduces continuous inputs of root exudates, litter, and residues, while simultaneously modifying soil moisture, temperature, aggregation, porosity, and nutrient availability. Consequently, it reorganizes the soil microbiome from the rhizosphere scale to community-network scales and drives key ecological processes such as carbon sequestration, nitrogen and phosphorus turnover, and disease suppression. Mechanistically, cover crops (i) enhance the supply of labile carbon through root exudation and residue return, stimulating microbial assimilation and enzyme-mediated decomposition and promoting SOC stabilization via microbial necromass formation-mineral association/aggregate protection; and (ii) optimize microbial habitats by improving aggregate architecture, pore structure, and water-holding capacity, and by regulating pH and nutrient availability, thereby increasing the abundance and functional potential of key guilds (e.g., diazotrophs, nitrifiers/denitrifiers, and microorganisms involved in organic-P mineralization) and their functional gene repertoires. In addition, cover cropping may strengthen system stability and suppressiveness through multi-trophic interactions and reconstruction of the soil micro-food web. However, under drought conditions or during the juvenile-tree stage, trade-offs can emerge due to context-dependent tree-groundcover competition for water and nutrients. Future progress requires long-term field experiments integrating multi-omics, isotope tracing, and process-based flux measurements to establish causal evidence chains and scenario-specific models linking management-microbial mechanisms-ecosystem services. Developing operational microbiome-based indicators will provide a scientific basis for groundcover species selection, cover pattern optimization, and fertilizer reduction with improved efficiency, as well as disease mitigation and fruit-quality enhancement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.