ArticleFrontiers in plant science2026
Accurate weed detection in UAV grassland images via intelligent annotation and multi-dimensional network enhancement.
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Accurate weed detection from unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) images remains difficult because weed targets often blend with surrounding vegetation, vary substantially in scale, and exhibit irregular boundaries under cluttered grassland backgrounds. Methods: This study presents a UAV grassland weed detection framework that combines intelligent annotation with task-oriented detector adaptation. For label generation, SAM produces instance-level vegetation masks, SigLIP performs few-shot semantic matching, and a vision-language model audits ambiguous candidates using few-shot weed references, local candidate patches, and full-image context. Candidate outputs are converted into YOLO-format labels for detector training. For detection, a YOLOv11-based model is adapted with four complementary components: EIEStem for shallow boundary preservation, C3k2-EMA for multi-scale feature aggregation, SPPF-LSKA for contextual modeling, and LDConv for adaptive downsampling of irregular weed targets. Results: On 200 reference images, the SAM-SigLIP-VLM workflow achieved 92.4% label precision, a mean IoU of 0.813, and an F1-score of 0.905, while reducing the annotation time per image from 96.8 s to 31.6 s. Under five-fold image-level cross-validation on a UAV grassland weed dataset, the improved detector achieved 0.762 ± 0.004 mAP@0.5 and 0.545 ± 0.005 mAP@0.5:0.95, improving the YOLOv11 baseline by 4.0 and 4.7 percentage points, respectively. Discussion: Additional evaluations cover annotation quality, module ablation, module placement, downsampling mechanisms, detector comparison, and validation on an external public crop-weed dataset. These results show that the proposed framework improves both annotation efficiency and UAV grassland weed detection performance in complex vegetation backgrounds.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.