Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42459367›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in plant science2026

Axial variation in conduit dimensions in angiosperm leaves and conifer needles - a review.

Roman Gebauer

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in plant science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Roman GebauerDepartment of Forest Botany, Dendrology and Geobiocoenology, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Technology, Mendel University in Brno, Brno, Czechia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The tip-to-base widening of xylem conduits is a well-documented feature of plant hydraulic architecture at the level of stems and branches. This anatomical pattern, predicted by hydraulic optimization theory (WBE model) minimizes the increase in hydraulic resistance associated with increasing conductive path length. Because the WBE model is not directly applicable to leaves, which function as near two-dimensional, laterally leaky vascular networks, an extended WBE framework was later developed to account for additional aspects of leaf vascular organization. This review focuses on only one component of that broader design - leaf level tip-to-base conduit widening. To date, only seven studies have directly quantified tip-to-base changes in conduit diameter within leaves or needles. Unlike stem, the exponent characterizing conduit widening in leaves is not universal across vascular plant lineages, likely reflecting differences in the geometric and functional constraints governing leaf vascular networks. An additional five studies have addressed spatial variation across the leaf vein hierarchy or scale petiole conduit diameter with leaf size. This limits our understanding of the functional significance of leaf-level xylem structural changes and how this differs systematically among lineages. Hence, this review emphasizes the need to unify methodologies for analyzing leaf xylem structure through the inclusion of hydraulic path length measurements. Nevertheless, advancing the field requires not only incorporating leaf-level tip-to-base conduit widening, but also adopting integrative sampling strategies that capture multiple dimensions of leaf hydraulic organisation within plant water transport frameworks.

Indexed as

allometric scalingaxial variationleaf hydraulicsmultipoint vascular analysisxylem anatomy

Identifiers

PMID42459367
PMCPMC13369018

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.