Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42459351›Full record

ArticleComputational brain & behavior2026

Time-Local Transformer.

Billy Dickson, James Mochizuki-Freeman, Md Rysul Kabir, Zoran Tiganj

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computational brain & behavior, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Billy DicksonDepartment of Computer Science, Indiana University Bloomington, Bloomington, Indiana USA.
James Mochizuki-FreemanDepartment of Computer Science, Indiana University Bloomington, Bloomington, Indiana USA.
Md Rysul KabirDepartment of Computer Science, Indiana University Bloomington, Bloomington, Indiana USA.
Zoran TiganjDepartment of Computer Science, Indiana University Bloomington, Bloomington, Indiana USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human language processing, characterized by its ability to capture long-range dependencies in sequential inputs, operates under the constraints of limited working memory. In contrast, state-of-the-art transformer models in artificial intelligence rely on access to the fixed context window, which deviates from the dynamic nature of human cognition. Here, we propose a novel approach to reconcile this disparity by integrating a computational model of working memory into the transformer architecture. This biologically-inspired modification constructs a time-local transformer, capable of learning complex dependencies without needing the full input history. Our findings demonstrate that this approach still preserves the capacity of transformers for effective sequence processing. This work is a step towards developing AI models that align more closely with the principles of human brain function, opening new avenues for understanding the neural underpinnings of language and cognition.

Indexed as

Language processingLong-range dependenciesNeural plausibilitySequence modelingTransformer modelsWorking memory

Identifiers

PMID42459351
PMCPMC13262383

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.