ArticleComputational brain & behavior2026
Context Size and Set Size Effects: The Relevance of Specific Cues When Searching Long-Term Memory.
Article in Computational brain & behavior, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A match made in mental space: Alignment between target skew and cue organization influences recall of attribute values.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Retrieving the relevant information from our knowledge and experiences poses a challenging problem to our memory system. In this study, we explore how retrieval of specific pieces of information from long-term memory is affected by the number of items to be remembered and by the characteristics of retrieval cues. Specifically, we looked at whether an increased semantic similarity between cue and target improves recall and whether additional context cues aid retrieval depending on their features and specificity. Using a cued-recall task, we observed across three experiments that increasing the number of learned word pairs slowed reaction times (RTs) and reduced retrieval accuracy. This effect was modulated by context: set size effects did not extend across multiple, unrelated lists. Semantic similarity between cues and targets consistently facilitated retrieval, independent of set size. Experiment 2 revealed no effect of additional visual context cues on RTs, while Experiment 3 demonstrated that larger semantic contexts hindered recall, leading to slower RTs and lower accuracy compared to unrelated lists. These findings are consistent with predictions from a model of memory portraying retrieval as a sequential search through a semantic network.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.