ArticleAIMS public health2026
Observing children's outdoor loose parts play, fundamental movement skills, and physical activity in after-school programs through a behavioral mapping approach.
Article in AIMS public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Outdoor Loose Parts Play (OLPP) has been recognized for its potential to support children's fundamental movement skills (FMS) and physical activity (PA). However, few researchers have explored its association in after-school settings or observed how different outdoor spaces may influence these outcomes. Purpose: We observed patterns of children's FMS and PA across two after-school programs with varied outdoor spaces in Nova Scotia, Canada, following an OLPP intervention. We also explored how types of loose parts and fixed features were associated with specific FMS and PA intensities. Methods: Using a multi-site case study approach, behavioral mapping was conducted with children aged 4-12 years pre/post a six-week OLPP intervention. Movements (FMS) were recorded using the Movement Observations during Play (MOP) measure, and PA intensities were recorded using the Children's Activity Rating Scale (CARS). Proportions of FMS, PA intensities, and environmental interactions (LP and fixed features) pre-post were explored using descriptive analyses and McNemar's test (p < 0.05). Logistic regression examined how interaction with LP and fixed features was associated with the likelihood of observing different movements and PA intensities. Results: Pre-post patterns differed by site. At Site A (larger, suburban, natural outdoor space, pre-existing OLPP), a higher proportion of stability skills were observed, while PA intensity remained unchanged. At Site B (smaller, urban, manufactured outdoor space, limited prior OLPP), a higher proportion of object control skills and moderate-intensity PA were observed. Across both sites, loose manufactured and loose natural materials were more likely to include object control skills, while fixed natural features were more likely to include stability skills. Conclusion: OLPP was associated with site-specific patterns. Findings suggest that LP types and fixed feature affordances may shape opportunities for different movements and PA intensities. These findings can inform educators and policymakers in designing outdoor play spaces that optimize children's movement opportunities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.