ReviewAIMS public health2026
Factors affecting nurses' professional quality of life in Europe - A systematic review.
Review in AIMS public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Nursing care involves both cognitive and emotional aspects, significantly impacting nurses' professional quality of life (ProQOL). This systematic review investigated the factors affecting nurses' professional quality of life in Europe. Methods: This systematic review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses reporting framework and was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (registration number: CRD420251133948). Searches were conducted in PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL, ScienceDirect, and EBSCOhost from inception to August 2025. Eligible peer-reviewed quantitative studies from European Union countries utilized the ProQOL instrument, reporting on all three dimensions: compassion satisfaction, burnout, and secondary traumatic stress. Two reviewers independently screened records, extracted data, and appraised methodological quality using the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal tool. Results: A total of 3407 records were initially identified, and 35 studies were ultimately included, comprising 8580 nursing staff across diverse clinical settings, predominantly hospitals, with 13 studies conducted during the coronavirus disease period in 2019. Most studies reported moderate levels of compassion satisfaction and moderate levels of burnout and secondary traumatic stress. Higher compassion satisfaction was generally associated with greater age and professional experience, relevant education and training, work engagement, supportive work environments, better perceived control over workload, and stronger psychosocial resources, including resilience, psychological flexibility, self-compassion, mindfulness, and social support. Higher burnout and secondary traumatic stress related to indirect exposure were consistently linked to a high workload, overtime, rotating schedules, job stress, workplace violence, employment in high-intensity clinical areas, and adverse psychological states, including persistent stress, fear related to the coronavirus disease, and moral distress. Conclusions: Professional quality of life among European nursing staff is influenced by a combination of demographic, occupational, and psychosocial factors. Multilevel strategies addressing organizational stressors while strengthening individual and team-based resources are warranted to improve compassion satisfaction and reduce burnout and secondary traumatic stress.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.