Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42459254›Full record

ArticleComputational brain & behavior2025

Visual Processing Within and Across Hemispheres: A Systems Factorial Technology Analysis.

Gaojie Fan, Allan J Collins, Robin D Thomas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computational brain & behavior, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Gaojie FanDepartment of Psychology, Miami University, Oxford, OH 45056 USA.
Allan J CollinsDepartment of Psychology, University of Richmond, Richmond, VA 23173 USA.
Robin D ThomasDepartment of Psychology, Miami University, Oxford, OH 45056 USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Researchers have identified a processing preference exhibited by the left versus right hemispheres when a stimulus pattern contains multiple scales of information. Specifically, in identification tasks, the left hemisphere processes relatively local details while the right hemisphere attends to the global information. Later, researchers became interested in how information separately handled by the hemispheres might be combined to determine an overall response when both hemispheres have access to the same information (metacontrol). Previous attempts to use RT were limited by the lack of theoretical development within the methods. Systems Factorial Technology (SFT) outlines a set of response time methods to identify characteristics of a processing system underlying a simple cognitive task. These characteristics include mental architecture (serial, parallel, or coactive), decisional stopping rule (self-terminating, exhaustive), independence of processing systems, and workload capacity (limited, unlimited, or supercapacity). Recently, this framework has been extended to a nested architecture motivated by these questions of how visual perception may differ across the cerebral hemispheres and how that information may be combined during detection and identification tasks. The current study applies these theoretical results to the perception of hierarchically defined patterns (Exp. 1) and compound Gabor patches (Exp. 2) in three visual field conditions: left only, right only, and bilateral. We present detailed results from six observers to identify both architecture and processing capacity within and across the visual fields. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s42113-025-00249-5.

Indexed as

Hemispheric lateralizationMathematical modelingNested architecturesSystems Factorial TechnologyVisual processing

Identifiers

PMID42459254
PMCPMC13298663

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.