ArticleComputational brain & behavior2025
A Convergence of Theories of Mind and Brain.
Article in Computational brain & behavior, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Several models of cognition were developed by different researchers at different levels of account (brain versus mind). While useful insofar as they account for a wide swath of empirical findings, they are often viewed separately, perhaps even in an adversarial sense. Yet, we show them to be formally nested within a more general mathematical framework which is partially derived from the Hodgkin-Huxley models. Mathematical analysis of this framework indicates these equivalent systems are a coherent family of models that describe the mind, on the one hand, and brain, on the other, providing statistically accurate descriptions and predictions of observed data. On this fact, our findings support a parallelism or monism between mind and brain. We conjecture that a key link in this formal equivalence is Luce's Existence Theorem, suggesting that different mind/brain phenomena arise from a competitive system in which behaviors are stochastically generated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.