ArticleThe Journal of clinical and aesthetic dermatology2026
Protective Effects of an Advanced Antioxidant Serum and an Encapsulated Vitamin C Serum From UV-Induced Erythema and Oxidative Stress.
Article in The Journal of clinical and aesthetic dermatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the protective effects of 2 antioxidant products against UV light by assessing UV-induced erythema and skin damage biomarkers.
methodsA randomized, controlled trial enrolled 15 healthy women aged 35 to 60 years. Participants' lower backs were marked with 4 test sites (5 cm × 6 cm). Test products (4 mg/cm
resultsPretreatment with the advanced antioxidant serum (TAP) demonstrated 72% (1× MED, LIMITATIONS: This study was conducted in healthy participants (mean age: 49 years), with limited representation across Fitzpatrick skin types. Future studies should include a more diverse study population.
conclusionPretreatment with TAP demonstrated significantly less UV-induced erythema and provided significantly greater cellular protection vs Encap-C serum and untreated/irradiated skin.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42459249PMC13372307What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.