Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42459248›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of clinical and aesthetic dermatology2026

Review of Skin Depigmentation Practices and Cutaneous Malignancy.

Lauren S Jones, Emily McEldrew, Cynthia L Bartus

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of clinical and aesthetic dermatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lauren S JonesDr. Jones is with the Dermatology Residency Program at Lehigh Valley Health Network, Allentown, Pennsylvania.
Emily McEldrewDr. McEldrew is with Advanced Dermatology Associates, Allentown, Pennsylvania.
Cynthia L BartusDr. Bartus is with Macaione and Papa Dermatology, Voorhees Township, New Jersey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo investigate the association between skin bleaching agents and the development of cutaneous malignancy.

methodsA scoping literature search was conducted in the PubMed and Google Scholar databases to identify studies and reports that included both skin depigmentation practices and development of cutaneous malignancy. Articles published in English and French were considered for review.

resultsTo date, reports are limited to a relatively small number of case reports in Africa. The most common skin bleaching agents used were topical clobetasol and hydroquinone with a duration of at least 15 years. Most patients had a reported skin phenotype of Fitzpatrick VI, and the most common skin cancer reported in patients was squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). The majority of these lesions were large, invasive, and/or ulcerated lesions in chronically sun-exposed areas. The most common site of metastasis was the lungs, and the mortality rate was high. LIMITATIONS: This is a literature review; information included is limited to what is available in the literature.

conclusionSkin bleaching agents have a powerful presence among a broad population, yet the consequences of their use in skin of color are poorly understood and potentially dangerous. Based on the available literature, there is potential for skin bleaching practices to be implicated as the causative agent for cutaneous SCC, especially in darker skin phenotypes. Therefore, there is a growing need for dermatologists to address this topic as a major public health concern with high morbidity and potential mortality to prompt further investigation.

Indexed as

corticosteroidexogenous ochronosishydroquinoneSkin bleachingsquamous cell carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID42459248
PMCPMC13372310

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.