ReviewThe Journal of clinical and aesthetic dermatology2026
Review of Skin Depigmentation Practices and Cutaneous Malignancy.
Review in The Journal of clinical and aesthetic dermatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo investigate the association between skin bleaching agents and the development of cutaneous malignancy.
methodsA scoping literature search was conducted in the PubMed and Google Scholar databases to identify studies and reports that included both skin depigmentation practices and development of cutaneous malignancy. Articles published in English and French were considered for review.
resultsTo date, reports are limited to a relatively small number of case reports in Africa. The most common skin bleaching agents used were topical clobetasol and hydroquinone with a duration of at least 15 years. Most patients had a reported skin phenotype of Fitzpatrick VI, and the most common skin cancer reported in patients was squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). The majority of these lesions were large, invasive, and/or ulcerated lesions in chronically sun-exposed areas. The most common site of metastasis was the lungs, and the mortality rate was high. LIMITATIONS: This is a literature review; information included is limited to what is available in the literature.
conclusionSkin bleaching agents have a powerful presence among a broad population, yet the consequences of their use in skin of color are poorly understood and potentially dangerous. Based on the available literature, there is potential for skin bleaching practices to be implicated as the causative agent for cutaneous SCC, especially in darker skin phenotypes. Therefore, there is a growing need for dermatologists to address this topic as a major public health concern with high morbidity and potential mortality to prompt further investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42459248PMC13372310What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.