Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42459242›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of clinical and aesthetic dermatology2026

From Error to Insight: A Curriculum Tool for Resident Education in Patient Safety, Quality Improvement, and Adverse Event Disclosure.

Victoria Garfinkel, Kaveh Nezafati

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of clinical and aesthetic dermatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Victoria GarfinkelMs. Garfinkel is with Medical School, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.
Kaveh NezafatiDr. Nezafati is with the Department of Dermatology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate whether a 3-part dermatology-specific curriculum improves resident competency in process mapping, root cause analysis, and adverse event disclosure.

methodsA pre-post educational intervention study was conducted in 2025 across 3 ACGME-accredited dermatology residency programs affiliated with a Texas-based academic medical center. The curriculum consisted of 3 sequential 1-hour sessions covering patient safety fundamentals, quality improvement tool application via flipped classroom, and peer-led adverse event disclosure simulation. Primary outcomes measured self-reported confidence in systems analysis, root cause analysis, and disclosure communication using 5-point Likert scales. Secondary outcomes assessed the knowledge of dermatology-specific error types and disclosure components. Twenty-seven residents completed pre-intervention surveys and 20 completed post-intervention surveys. Data were analyzed using Mann-Whitney

resultsResidents demonstrated significant improvements across all primary competencies. Median confidence in process mapping increased from 1 to 4 ( LIMITATIONS: Study limitations include reliance on self-reported measures, anonymous survey design precluding paired analysis, modest sample size, lower postintervention response rates with potential volunteer and nonresponse bias due to voluntary participation, and single-institution implementation without long-term follow-up assessment; the curriculum was locally developed without external funding or institutional support that influenced its design or implementation.

conclusionThis dermatology-specific curriculum significantly improved resident competencies in systems analysis, root cause analysis, and adverse event disclosure. The specialty-focused design and scalable peer-led simulation model offer a practical approach for adoption across dermatology residency programs.

Indexed as

adverse event disclosureDermatology residency educationmedical errorpatient safetyprocess mappingquality improvementroot cause analysis

Identifiers

PMID42459242
PMCPMC13372305

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.