ArticleComputational brain & behavior2025
Creating Something Different: Similarity, Contrast, and Representativeness in Categorization.
Article in Computational brain & behavior, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The ability to generate new concepts and ideas is among the most fascinating aspects of human cognition, but we do not have a strong understanding of the cognitive processes and representations underlying concept generation. Previous work in this domain has focused on how the statistical structure of known categories generalizes to generated categories, overlooking whether (and if so, how) contrast between the known and generated categories is a factor. In this paper, we explore a different factor: contrast from known categories. We propose two novel approaches to modeling category contrast: one focused on exemplar dissimilarity and another based on the representativeness heuristic. Across three behavioral experiments, we find that people generate new categories that contrast from observed categories and distribute exemplars acoss "unoccupied" regions of stimulus space. The model based on the representativeness heuristic captured human category generation better when the known category was well captured by a Gaussian distribution. Conversely, the exemplar-based model captured human-generated categories better when the known category was not Gaussian distributed. Our results suggest contrast is a fundamental principle used in generating exemplars of a new category. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s42113-024-00209-5.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.