Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42459217›Full record

ArticleJournal of nutritional science2026

Balancing nutrition, ethics, and sustainability about dairy: UK consumers' knowledge, attitudes, practice, and intended choices.

Hattie Bracey, Michael Barnard, Solveig Mendowski, Jérémie Renaud, Stuart R Gray, Emilie Combet

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of nutritional science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Hattie BraceyHuman Nutrition, School of Medicine, Dentistry and Nursing, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-9844-8434
Michael BarnardHuman Nutrition, School of Medicine, Dentistry and Nursing, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Solveig MendowskiValorex, La Messayais, France.
Jérémie RenaudBleu-Blanc-Coeur, Rennes, France.
Stuart R GraySchool of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Health, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8969-9636
Emilie CombetHuman Nutrition, School of Medicine, Dentistry and Nursing, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Milk is nutritionally rich, but its production poses ethical and environmental concerns. Farming practices can influence milk's nutritional quality and improve its sustainability, creating opportunities for innovation. This study explores consumer willingness to adopt improved products and the interrelationships of knowledge and attitudes towards the dairy industry in relation to purchasing and consumption. We conducted an online survey of UK adults from November 2021 to March 2022, covering knowledge and attitudes towards dairy, dairy consumption, likelihood to purchase improved milk, and socio-demographics. Participants were classified as low or high dairy consumers based on their intake: below or above 1.81 dairy portions per day. Of the 706 dairy consumers who completed the survey, 47% reported consuming ≥1.81 portions of dairy products daily. High dairy consumption predicted more positive attitudes towards dairy farmers than lower consumption. Conversely, low consumption was associated with greater concern for animal welfare and the environmental implications of dairy (

Indexed as

Consumer BehaviorDairy ProductsHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeNutritive ValueAdultAgedAnimalsAnimal WelfareCattleChoice BehaviorDairyingFemaleFood PreferencesHumansMaleMiddle Agedanimal welfareconsumer attitudesconsumer behaviourdairy productsfood sustainability

Identifiers

PMID42459217
PMCPMC13369254

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.