ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2026
Medium-to-long-term success rate of left atrial appendage closure using endocardial sutures and postoperative anticoagulant strategies.
Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Surgical endocardial closure of the left atrial appendage (LAA) may reduce thromboembolic risk in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF); however, evidence regarding its medium-to-long-term durability remains limited. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of endocardial suture closure of the LAA during concomitant cardiac surgery. Methods: This retrospective study included 50 patients with valvular heart disease and AF who underwent valve surgery, the Cox-Maze IV procedure, and LAA closure using an endocardial suture technique between 2013 and 2018. Intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) was used to assess immediate closure. Transthoracic echocardiography and TEE were performed during follow-up. Closure failure was defined as a residual LAA stump >1 cm or residual to-and-fro flow between the left atrium and LAA. Results: The mean follow-up duration was 7.16 ± 1.73 years. Intraoperative TEE showed no residual LAA stump or to-and-fro flow in any patient. At follow-up, no patient had a residual stump >1 cm, whereas residual to-and-fro flow was detected in 5 patients (10.0%), corresponding to a medium-to-long-term closure success rate of 90.0%. Four of these five patients (80.0%) developed thrombus within the residual LAA stump, and one experienced an ischemic stroke. No stroke occurred among patients with imaging-confirmed successful LAA closure. Discussion: Endocardial suture closure provided a high medium-to-long-term imaging success rate in this single-center cohort. Residual to-and-fro flow, even in the absence of a stump >1 cm, may be clinically relevant because it was frequently accompanied by thrombus formation. These findings should be interpreted as hypothesis-generating because of the limited sample size and low event rate. Postoperative anticoagulation decisions should remain individualized and guideline-informed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.