ArticleAnnals of African medicine2026
Practices of Evidence-based Mathematics Interventions for Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Cross-sectional Study.
Article in Annals of African medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsThis study investigates the practices and perceptions of educators regarding evidence-based mathematics interventions for children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD).
methodsA quantitative survey design was employed, collecting data from 250 teachers in special and inclusive education settings.
resultsFindings revealed strong educator awareness and positive perceptions of the effectiveness of strategies such as explicit instruction, the concrete-representational-abstract sequence, task analysis, and technology-assisted learning like video modeling. Despite high implementation rates and recognition of these practices' benefits for conceptual understanding and skill generalization, significant barriers impeded consistent application. Primary challenges included insufficient training, time constraints, limited resources, and a lack of institutional support.
conclusionsThe study concludes that a critical research-to-practice gap persists, underscoring the necessity for enhanced professional development, systemic resource allocation, and stronger administrative support to translate evidence-based knowledge into sustained, high-fidelity classroom practice for improved mathematics outcomes in students with ASD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.