Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42458916›Full record

ReviewPathology international2026

Effects of Nicotine on Urinary Bladder Carcinogenesis.

Shugo Suzuki, Samuel M Cohen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pathology international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Shugo SuzukiDepartment of Molecular Pathology, Osaka Metropolitan University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8938-9670
Samuel M CohenDepartment of Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology, and Buffett Cancer Center, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, USA.

Funding

Ono Pharmaceutical Co., LtdSmoking Research Foundation
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Epidemiological evidence has consistently demonstrated an association between tobacco smoking and an increased risk of urinary bladder cancer. However, the specific role of nicotine, independent from established genotoxic carcinogens such as aromatic amines, has not been clarified. This review summarises experimental evidence regarding the carcinogenic effects of nicotine and the underlying molecular mechanisms in urinary bladder carcinogenesis. In a two-stage rat carcinogenesis model, nicotine administration significantly increased the incidence and multiplicity of invasive urothelial carcinoma. In contrast, nicotine treatment alone increased hyperplasia but did not induce the formation of tumors, suggesting that nicotine functions as an enhancing agent for tumorigenesis, rather than as a DNA reactive agent. Mechanistically, nicotine has been shown to induce cell proliferation through two distinct pathways. One involves the activation of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs), particularly the α7 subunit, leading to activation of STAT3 and ERK1/2 signalling pathway. The other involves urothelial cytotoxicity followed by regenerative increased cell proliferation. In addition, cotinine, the major urinary metabolite of nicotine, was found to induce proliferation via nAChRs, without inducing cytotoxicity. These findings indicate that nicotine exposure may contribute to bladder cancer risk through mechanisms involving increased cell proliferation, either due to direct mitogenesis or secondary to cytotoxicity and regeneration.

Indexed as

CarcinogenesisNicotineUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsAnimalsCell ProliferationHumansRatsReceptors, NicotinicUrinary BladderNicotineReceptors, Nicotinicnicotinenicotinic acetylcholine receptoroxidative stressraturinary bladder carcinogenesis

Identifiers

PMID42458916
PMCPMC13373482

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.