Trial reportBMC psychology2026
Therapeutic alliance in guided internet-delivered cognitive behavioural therapy: a thematic analysis of patients with non-cardiac chest pain.
Trial report in BMC psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06136494 (Patient and Societal Benefits of Guided Internet-delivered Cognitive Behavioural Therapy for Cardiac Anxiety in Patients With Non-cardiac Chest Pain), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Patient and Societal Benefits of Guided Internet-delivered Cognitive Behavioural Therapy for Cardiac Anxiety in Patients With Non-cardiac Chest Pain
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTherapeutic alliance is an important aspect of psychotherapy and has been associated with treatment outcomes, but less is known about how it is experienced and maintained in guided internet-delivered cognitive behavioural therapy (iCBT), particularly when treatment concerns persistent physical symptoms such as non-cardiac chest pain (NCCP). This study explored how participants in an 8-week guided iCBT programme for NCCP experienced the therapeutic alliance, and how their accounts related to established alliance models.
methodsThis qualitative interview study was conducted alongside a randomised controlled trial evaluating an eight-week guided iCBT programme for adults with NCCP and cardiac anxiety. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 22 participants who had completed the programme. The interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analysed using reflexive thematic analysis informed by Bordin's model of therapeutic alliance, while remaining open to inductive theme development. Descriptive statistics were used to summarise participant characteristics.
resultsThe analysis generated three themes. First, agreement on goals and tasks was shaped by whether participants experienced the programme as personally relevant and whether treatment tasks could be balanced between fit and challenge. Second, the emotional bond between participant and therapist was supported by timely, attuned, and appropriately calibrated written feedback, although participants differed in their preferred level of emotional closeness and professional distance. Third, acceptability of the digital medium for collaboration encompassed the delivery format, the online platform, and the treatment content. Across themes, participants described alliance in the digital context as shaped by processes of negotiation in which therapist responsiveness helped them make sense of the treatment rationale, manage strain, and sustain engagement.
conclusionsIn guided internet-delivered cognitive behavioural therapy for non-cardiac chest pain, therapeutic alliance appeared to depend not only on agreement about goals, tasks, and emotional bond, but also on the acceptability of the digital medium through which collaboration occurred. The findings suggest that therapists delivering text-based internet interventions may need to actively calibrate task demands, relational tone, and symptom explanations to support engagement and collaboration.
trial registrationThis qualitative study was conducted within the registered parent trial: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06136494; registered on November 13, 2023.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.