ArticleMovement ecology2026
Linkages among foraging movements, prey provisioning, and reproduction in a central place foraging seabird.
Article in Movement ecology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundA seabird's ability to efficiently find prey directly affects reproduction, and seabird population declines are frequently linked to forage fish depletion. Reduced forage fish availability often limits seabird egg production and chick provisioning, but impacts to foraging movements remain largely unresolved, as does the effect of movement flexibility on provisioning and reproduction in conditions of reduced forage fish availability.
methodsThis study assesses drivers of foraging movement and the role of foraging movement in mediating provisioning and reproduction in a central place foraging seabird, the common tern (Sterna hirundo), by integrating movement (GPS telemetry), chick provisioning, and reproductive productivity data. Data were collected across four breeding seasons (2021-2024) on the largest common tern colony in the Gulf of Maine, where ocean warming is precipitating shifts in forage fish populations.
resultsIn poor prey and productivity years, when clutch size (eggs per nest), fledging success, and provisioning of preferred prey (herrings [Clupea harengus, Alosa spp.], hakes/rockling [Merluccius bilinearis, Urophycis spp., Enchelyopus cimbrius], sand lances [Ammodytes spp.]) were reduced, common terns increased foraging trip durations by 23%-87% and expanded foraging ranges by 17%-51%. Range expansions occurred regardless of sex or breeding status and were driven by increased use of distant waters (up to ~150 km from the colony) rich in forage fishes preferred by common terns. In years of increased reproductive success and high preferred prey provisioning, foraging movements were shorter, and foraging locations focused on waters immediately surrounding the colony (within ~10 km), as well as two nearby river mouths (Piscataqua River and Merrimack River).
conclusionsOur results suggest that common tern foraging movements are flexible in response to forage fish availability, but that increased movement effort in years of reduced prey availability may be insufficient to maintain chick diet and survival. In regions like the Gulf of Maine, where ocean-warming continues to induce shifts in forage fish populations, additional protection may be critical to central place foraging seabirds. Without proactive management, breeding seasons marked by increased foraging movement effort with little resulting reproductive success may become increasingly frequent.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.