ArticleJournal of medical case reports2026
Incidental detection of adrenal schwannoma: a case report.
Article in Journal of medical case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAdrenal schwannomas (AS) are rare benign peripheral nerve sheath tumors that originate from Schwann cells. They are often asymptomatic and discovered incidentally on imaging for unrelated conditions. Owing to its rarity and nonspecific clinical presentation, AS can be misdiagnosed as other adrenal neoplasms, necessitating radiological and histopathological evaluation for accurate diagnosis. CASE PRESENTATION: We report the case of a 53-year-old Iranian man with a history of hypertension and fatty liver disease, who presented with mild abdominal pain. Imaging studies revealed a large, well-circumscribed, heterogeneous adrenal lesion with cystic changes and calcifications, raising suspicion of an adrenal neoplasm. Laboratory investigations ruled out functional adrenal tumors. The patient underwent laparotomy and left adrenalectomy, and histopathological examination revealed a well-encapsulated tumor with spindle cell proliferation, nuclear palisading (Verocay bodies), and hyalinized blood vessels. To further confirm the diagnosis, immunohistochemical (IHC) staining was performed, which demonstrated positivity for S-100 protein, consistent with AS.
conclusionsThis case highlights the importance of considering AS in the differential diagnosis of adrenal masses. Histopathological and IHC remain the gold standard for definitive diagnosis. Complete surgical resection is considered curative, and the long-term prognosis is excellent.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42458601What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.