Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42458597›Full record

ArticleParasites & vectors2026

Asynchronous local differences in Lyme disease environmental hazard driven by variation in tick abundance and Borrelia burgdorferi infection prevalence.

Jessica L Hall, Agata Delnicka, Kevin J Bown, Richard J Birtles

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Parasites & vectors, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jessica L HallHuman and Natural Sciences, School of Science, Engineering and Environment, University of Salford, Salford, M5 4WT, UK.
Agata DelnickaDisease Control, Moredun Research Institute, Pentlands Science Park, Bush Loan, Penicuik, Midlothian, EH26 0P, UK.
Kevin J BownHuman and Natural Sciences, School of Science, Engineering and Environment, University of Salford, Salford, M5 4WT, UK.
Richard J BirtlesHuman and Natural Sciences, School of Science, Engineering and Environment, University of Salford, Salford, M5 4WT, UK. r.j.birtles@salford.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe tick-borne disease Lyme borreliosis (LB) is a clear and increasing public health threat across the temperate regions of the northern hemisphere, including the United Kingdom. The epidemiology of LB is shaped by the environmental hazard posed by its causative agent Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato, which is frequently quantified in terms of the density of infected nymphal ticks (DIN).

methodsWe report quantification of the dynamics of DIN at three sites in close proximity to one another in Cumbria, a region of the UK where LB is frequently reported, through monthly surveys of questing Ixodes ricinus nymphs over a 33-month period.

resultsDespite the proximity of study sites, we observed significant spatial variation in DIN between them. We also observed significant temporal variation in DIN at all three sites, but this variation was asynchronous. Changes in both tick abundance and B. burgdorferi infection prevalence underlay this variation.

conclusionsThese observations suggest very local key ecological determinants of DIN and that meaningful estimation/prediction of LB risk on a national or regional scale is extremely challenging.

Indexed as

Borrelia burgdorferiIxodesLyme DiseaseAnimalsHumansNymphPrevalenceUnited KingdomBorrelia burgdorferiIxodes ricinusLyme borreliosisTick-borne disease

Identifiers

PMID42458597
PMCPMC13681760

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.