Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42458582›Full record

ArticleGenome biology2026

Benchmarking protein sequence and structure search methods for remote homology detection.

Yuan Liu, Yingquan Zhou, Yan Huang, Hongyi Xin, Xiaoyong Pan, Hong-Bin Shen

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yuan LiuInstitute of Image Processing and Pattern Recognition, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, and Key Laboratory of System Control and Information Processing, Ministry of Education of China, Shanghai, 200240, China.
Yingquan ZhouInstitute of Image Processing and Pattern Recognition, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, and Key Laboratory of System Control and Information Processing, Ministry of Education of China, Shanghai, 200240, China.
Yan HuangState Key Laboratory of Infrared Physics, Shanghai Institute of Technical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 500 Yu Tian Road, Shanghai, 200083, China.
Hongyi XinGlobal Institute of Future Technology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200240, China.
Xiaoyong PanInstitute of Image Processing and Pattern Recognition, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, and Key Laboratory of System Control and Information Processing, Ministry of Education of China, Shanghai, 200240, China.
Hong-Bin ShenInstitute of Image Processing and Pattern Recognition, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, and Key Laboratory of System Control and Information Processing, Ministry of Education of China, Shanghai, 200240, China. hbshen@sjtu.edu.cn.

Funding

National Key Research and Development Program of China No. 2025YFA1805600National Natural Science Foundation of China No. 62473257National Natural Science Foundation of China No. 62573293Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality No. 24510714300Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality No. 24ZR1435300
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProtein sequence and structure similarity-based search is an important task, which underpins protein annotation, evolutionary analysis, large-scale functional inference, and the exploration of the protein "dark space". The rapid growth of sequence and predicted structure databases has spurred diverse search methods, yet their evaluation remains limited to fold-level similarity and inconsistent benchmarking protocols.

resultsWe present a comprehensive benchmark for protein sequence and structure search. Using this framework, we evaluate 14 representative methods spanning sequence alignment, structure alignment, and representation-based approaches across multiple biologically relevant scenarios. Our results show pronounced and context-dependent differences among methods. Structure alignment methods excel at detecting fold-level and geometric similarity, while representation-based searching approaches show advantages in capturing functional similarity under low sequence identity and robustness to predicted structures. Notably, all evaluated methods show limited effectiveness on intrinsically disordered proteins.

conclusionsThis benchmark establishes a standardized framework for evaluating protein similarity search methods, providing a practical resource for method selection and a foundation for the development of next-generation approaches capable of addressing diverse homology search challenges.

Indexed as

ProteinsSequence AlignmentSequence Analysis, ProteinStructural Homology, ProteinAlgorithmsAmino Acid SequenceBenchmarkingComputational BiologyDatabases, ProteinSequence Homology, Amino AcidProteinsBenchmarkProtein similarity searchRepresentation-based searchingStructure alignment

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.