Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42458510›Full record

ArticleBMC women's health2026

Eating patterns and psychological distress among young women: the moderating role of cognitive reappraisal.

Aiza Qamar, Ayesha Sarfaraz, Ayesha Khalid, Sara Zaib Mufti, Wahab Ali Khan, Shehla A Yasin

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in BMC women's health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Aiza QamarDepartment of Nutrition and Health Promotion, University of Home Economics, Lahore, Pakistan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-1383-1637
Ayesha SarfarazDepartment of Psychology, University of Home Economics, Lahore, Pakistan. ayeshasarfaraz@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5620-0891
Ayesha KhalidDepartment of Psychology, University of Home Economics, Lahore, Pakistan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0862-7161
Sara Zaib MuftiDepartment of Nutrition Sciences, University of South Asia, Lahore, Pakistan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-1047-4514
Wahab Ali KhanDepartment of Nutrition and Health Promotion, University of Home Economics, Lahore, Pakistan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5478-3544
Shehla A YasinDepartment of Gender and Development Studies, Lahore College for Women University, Lahore, Pakistan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5168-4495

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPsychological distress among university students is a pressing public health concern. Emerging research in nutritional psychology links eating patterns to mental health outcomes, while emotion regulation processes shape individual stress responses. Female university students in Pakistan are particularly vulnerable due to compounding sociocultural pressures, rigorous academic demands, and limited mental health resources. This cross-sectional study investigates the association between eating patterns and psychological distress in this demographic, specifically examining whether cognitive reappraisal (an adaptive emotion regulation strategy) moderates this relationship.

methodsData were collected via purposive sampling from 354 female university students in Lahore, Pakistan. Assessments utilized the Healthy Eating Index (HEI) for dietary patterns, the Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (ERQ) for cognitive reappraisal, and the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales-21 (DASS-21) for psychological distress. Data were analyzed using Pearson correlations, linear regression, and hierarchical moderation.

resultsHealthier eating patterns were significantly associated with reduced levels of depression (r = - .233, p < .001), anxiety (r = - .174, p < .05), and stress (r = - .192, p < .05). Cognitive reappraisal correlated positively with healthier eating (r = .215, p < .05) and negatively correlated with depression (r = - .412, p < .01), anxiety (r = - .367, p < .01), and stress (r = - .389, p < .01). Regression models confirmed that eating patterns significantly predicted depression (β = - 0.23, p < .01), anxiety (β = - 0.17, p < .05), and stress (β = - 0.19, p < .01). Moderation analyses indicated that cognitive reappraisal significantly moderated the relationship between eating patterns and psychological distress (interaction β range = - 0.12 to - 0.17), explaining an additional 2-3% of variance. Specifically, higher cognitive reappraisal strengthened the protective association between healthier eating patterns and lower psychological distress while attenuating distress associated with unhealthy eating patterns.

conclusionHealthier eating patterns and higher levels of cognitive reappraisal were associated with lower psychological distress among young women in academic settings. Cognitive reappraisal appeared to play a protective moderating role by strengthening the beneficial association between healthier eating patterns and lower levels of depression, anxiety, and stress while reducing psychological vulnerability associated with poorer eating habits. These findings highlight the importance of holistic university mental health initiatives that integrate nutritional awareness with adaptive emotion-regulation training to promote psychological well-being among female students.

Indexed as

CognitionDiet, HealthyEmotional RegulationFeeding BehaviorPsychological DistressStress, PsychologicalStudentsAdolescentAdultAnxietyCoping SkillsCross-Sectional StudiesDepressionFemaleHumansPakistanCognitive ReappraisalEating PatternsNutritional PsychologyPsychological Distressyoung women

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.