Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42458497›Full record

ArticleOrphanet journal of rare diseases2026

Methodology for eliciting consensus on high-level concepts in rare connective tissue and musculoskeletal diseases (ReCONNET-ELICIT).

Laurent Arnaud, Guillermo Pons-Estel, Mariele Gatto, Chiara Tani, Hervé Devilliers, Rosaria Talarico, Giuseppe Turchetti, Marta Mosca

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Orphanet journal of rare diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Laurent ArnaudDepartment of Rheumatology, National Reference Center for Rare Autoimmune Diseases (RESO), Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France. Laurent.arnaud@chru-strasbourg.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8077-8394
Guillermo Pons-EstelRegional Center for Autoimmune and Rheumatic Diseases (CREAR), Rosario, Argentina.
Mariele GattoAcademic Rheumatology Centre, Department of Clinical and Biological Sciences, University of Turin, AO Mauriziano, Turin, Italy.
Chiara TaniDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Hervé DevilliersInternal Medicine and Systemic Diseases Unit, University Hospital Centre Dijon, Dijon, France.
Rosaria TalaricoRheumatology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Pisana, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Giuseppe TurchettiInstitute of Management, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, 56127, Pisa, Italy.
Marta MoscaRheumatology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Pisana, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.

Funding

European Commission 101157143
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ReCONNET-ELICIT methodology represents an innovative and systematic approach to gather expert consensus on complex, high-level concepts related to rare connective tissue and musculoskeletal diseases (rCTDs). Developed within the framework of European Reference Networks (ERNs) ReCONNET, this methodology aims to overcome the challenges associated with defining complex features that lack consensus in rCTDs, such as composite definitions for severe or refractory disease. The core premise of RECONNET-ELICIT is that individual expertise, including that of experts, is inherently limited, but that aggregating insights from a sufficiently large and diverse group can achieve extensive and relevant facet elicitation. The RECONNET-ELICIT process begins with assembling a diverse panel from various geographical backgrounds. This inclusive approach ensures that multiple perspectives are considered. The next step involves crowdsourcing responses through an online survey, where participants suggest as many facets of the high-level concept as possible. These proposals are then systematically analyzed and recoded into broader categories through a consensus-driven binning process. Following this, the panel reviews the consolidated list of facets and votes on their final inclusion, typically utilizing rating scales to minimize bias. This approach is particularly valuable in rCTD contexts where limited data are available. Overall, ReCONNET-ELICIT aim at enhancing the clarity and shared understanding of complex disease concepts by integrating expert insights within an asynchronous, structured, participatory framework while avoiding dominance bias. Its flexibility and focus on collective agreement make it especially useful for advancing knowledge and improving management strategies for rare CTDs.

Indexed as

Connective Tissue DiseasesMusculoskeletal DiseasesRare DiseasesConsensusHumans

Identifiers

PMID42458497
PMCPMC13656601

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.