ArticleOrphanet journal of rare diseases2026
Methodology for eliciting consensus on high-level concepts in rare connective tissue and musculoskeletal diseases (ReCONNET-ELICIT).
Article in Orphanet journal of rare diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The ReCONNET-ELICIT methodology represents an innovative and systematic approach to gather expert consensus on complex, high-level concepts related to rare connective tissue and musculoskeletal diseases (rCTDs). Developed within the framework of European Reference Networks (ERNs) ReCONNET, this methodology aims to overcome the challenges associated with defining complex features that lack consensus in rCTDs, such as composite definitions for severe or refractory disease. The core premise of RECONNET-ELICIT is that individual expertise, including that of experts, is inherently limited, but that aggregating insights from a sufficiently large and diverse group can achieve extensive and relevant facet elicitation. The RECONNET-ELICIT process begins with assembling a diverse panel from various geographical backgrounds. This inclusive approach ensures that multiple perspectives are considered. The next step involves crowdsourcing responses through an online survey, where participants suggest as many facets of the high-level concept as possible. These proposals are then systematically analyzed and recoded into broader categories through a consensus-driven binning process. Following this, the panel reviews the consolidated list of facets and votes on their final inclusion, typically utilizing rating scales to minimize bias. This approach is particularly valuable in rCTD contexts where limited data are available. Overall, ReCONNET-ELICIT aim at enhancing the clarity and shared understanding of complex disease concepts by integrating expert insights within an asynchronous, structured, participatory framework while avoiding dominance bias. Its flexibility and focus on collective agreement make it especially useful for advancing knowledge and improving management strategies for rare CTDs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.