ArticleCost effectiveness and resource allocation : C/E2026
Cost-effectiveness analysis of bacterial vaginosis screening strategies in women attempting for natural conception.
Article in Cost effectiveness and resource allocation : C/E, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesBacterial vaginosis (BV) is associated with reduced fecundability in women. To address the limited accessibility and diagnostic sensitivity of current preconception BV screening in China, this study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of BV Blue, an accessible, self-administered rapid test.
methodsA decision tree model was constructed from a societal perspective to compare five screening strategies: No screening, Amsel criteria, BV Blue testing alone, sequential BV Blue-Nugent testing, and Nugent scoring alone. Effectiveness was defined as the number of pregnancies per 100,000 women over one year. Cost-effectiveness was evaluated using incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs), referenced against a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold based on China's per capita GDP. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess model robustness.
resultsIn a simulated cohort of 100,000 women, BV Blue testing yielded 842 additional pregnancies compared with no screening (ICER: CNY 2,827 per pregnancy), well below the WTP threshold of CNY 99,665. The sequential and Amsel strategies were absolutely dominated by BV Blue testing. Compared with BV Blue testing, Nugent strategy yielded 171 additional pregnancies (ICER: CNY 198,051 per pregnancy), remaining below the three-fold per capita GDP threshold (CNY 298,995). However, sensitivity analyses indicated that the cost-effectiveness of Nugent strategy was not robust, being highly sensitive to BV Blue testing's diagnostic sensitivity and pregnancy rates. On the cost-effectiveness acceptability curve, BV Blue testing consistently demonstrated the highest probability of being the optimal strategy.
conclusionIn the preconception period, all screening strategies yielded more pregnancies than no screening. Both BV Blue testing and Nugent scoring were cost-effective, whereas the Amsel and sequential strategies were not. BV Blue testing is a promising screening tool for preconception BV management. These findings may inform the selection of diagnostic pathways in China's national preconception screening program.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42458496What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.