ArticleRadiation oncology (London, England)2026
Postoperative adjuvant therapy for pT3N0M0 esophageal carcinoma: does radiotherapy offer added benefit beyond chemotherapy?
Article in Radiation oncology (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
background and purposeThe optimal postoperative adjuvant treatment for pathological T3N0M0 (pT3N0M0) thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (TESCC) remains unclear. This study evaluated whether adding radiotherapy to postoperative chemotherapy provides an additional survival benefit in these patients.
methodsWe retrospectively reviewed 1,090 TESCC patients treated at Sichuan Cancer Hospital (2009-2020). After applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, 356 patients who received adjuvant therapy were analyzed: 274 underwent surgery plus postoperative chemotherapy (S+POCT) and 82 received surgery plus postoperative chemoradiotherapy (S+POCRT). Propensity score matching balanced baseline characteristics between groups. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were compared, and survival predictors were assessed using a Cox proportional hazards model.
resultsBefore matching, the S+POCRT group had more female patients, and patients with vascular or perineural invasion were more likely to receive chemoradiotherapy. After matching (82 patients per group), baseline characteristics were balanced. The 5-year OS was 70.9% for the entire cohort. In the matched cohort, 5-year OS rates were 65.3% (S+POCT) versus 71.4% (S+POCRT), and 5-year DFS rates were 63.3% versus 70.9%, respectively. No statistically significant differences in OS or DFS were observed between the two groups. Multivariate analysis indicated that neither postoperative chemotherapy nor chemoradiotherapy independently improved OS. In the subgroup analysis, patients with tumors located in the lower third of the esophagus were more likely to derive a significant DFS benefit from S+POCRT but no subgroup showed a statistically significant OS benefit from S+POCRT compared with S+POCT.
conclusionsFor pT3N0M0 TESCC patients undergoing R0 resection without neoadjuvant therapy, postoperative chemotherapy alone provides comparable survival to chemoradiotherapy in the overall retrospective cohort. These findings suggest that the routine addition of postoperative radiotherapy to chemotherapy may not provide a clear survival advantage in the overall pT3N0M0 TESCC population. Further prospective studies are needed to identify patients who may benefit from postoperative radiotherapy. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42458490What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.