SynthesisJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2026
Surgical outcomes of percutaneous pedicle screw fixation for unstable traumatic thoracolumbar fractures: a meta-analysis focused on randomized controlled trials from the past 15 years.
Synthesis in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivePrevious meta-analyses often lacked explicit time and included heterogeneous case types and surgical strategies. This led to substantial heterogeneity and limited the clinical applicability of these meta-analyses. This study focuses on evidence from the past 15 years, systematically comparing percutaneous pedicle screw fixation (PPSF) with open pedicle screw fixation (OPSF) for unstable traumatic thoracolumbar fractures (TTF). We aim to evaluate perioperative outcomes and radiographic correction based on contemporary practice.
methodsRandomized controlled trials (RCTs) published in English between January 2011 and January 2026 were retrieved from PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and the Web of Science Core Collection. Studies were screened using predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Six RCTs involving 305 patients were included, with 151 patients in the experimental group and 154 in the control group. Meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.4. Mean difference (MD) was used as the effect size. Heterogeneity was assessed with the I
resultsThe random-effects meta-analysis showed that the experimental group had significantly less intraoperative blood loss (MD = - 32.51 mL, 95% CI - 57.52 to - 7.51, P = 0.01), shorter postoperative hospital stay (MD = - 2.09 d, 95% CI - 3.89 to - 0.29, P = 0.02), and smaller postoperative Cobb angle (MD = - 1.06°, 95% CI - 1.67 to - 0.46, P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in operative time (MD = - 10.15 min, 95% CI - 28.75 to 8.46, P = 0.29) or postoperative vertebral wedging angle (MD = 0.25°, 95% CI - 1.73 to 2.24, P = 0.80) between groups. Sensitivity analyses identified the study by Yang et al. as the main source of heterogeneity for operative time. After excluding this study, the fixed-effects model showed a shorter operative time in the experimental group (MD = - 8.85 min, 95% CI - 12.74 to - 4.95, P < 0.001). Perioperative outcomes showed high heterogeneity, whereas radiographic outcomes showed low to moderate heterogeneity. Egger's test indicated no significant publication bias. Risk-of-bias assessment classified four RCTs as having a low risk of bias and two as having some concerns; no study was judged to have a high risk of bias.
conclusionPPSF may offer perioperative advantages over OPSF in selected unstable traumatic thoracolumbar fractures, mainly by reducing visible intraoperative blood loss and shortening postoperative hospital stay. PPSF was also associated with a modestly smaller postoperative segmental Cobb angle, although its clinical relevance and long-term durability remain uncertain. The operative-time finding should be interpreted cautiously because it became significant only in exploratory sensitivity analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42458487What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.