ArticleBMC medical education2026
Knowledge and attitudes toward people who stutter among health sciences students: a cross-sectional study.
Article in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe social model of disability acknowledges that the difficulties faced by persons who stutter (PWS) stem not only from speech dysfluency but also from societal barriers, misconceptions, and stigmatizing attitudes that limit participation and inclusion. As future healthcare professionals, health sciences students play an important role in promoting early detection, proper referral, and supportive care. However, there is limited research about their knowledge, beliefs, and attitudes around stuttering, particularly in Palestine and underserved areas.
methodsA cross-sectional study was carried out on 603 students enrolled in 14 health-related fields at An-Najah National University in Palestine. Participants completed an online questionnaire that assessed their knowledge and attitudes toward stuttering. SPSS version 25 was used to conduct descriptive statistics and chi-square tests to investigate the relationships between responses and gender, residence, and academic discipline.
resultsSignificant misconceptions persisted even though the majority of participants acknowledged the significance of early identification (87.9%) and disputed the idea that stutterers are less intelligent (83.3%). Less than half (38.1%) were aware of nearby treatment facilities, and only 22.9% recognized stuttering as a genetic problem. Many participants thought stutterers were quiet or shy (69.5%), more susceptible to mental health issues (73.6%), and socially ignored (46.1%). Gender, place of residence, and academic discipline all showed significant disparities. While students from a number of other disciplines showed more doubt and misconceptions, students in audiology and speech consistently showed the highest levels of knowledge and more evidence-informed attitudes.
conclusionThis study reveals considerable knowledge gaps and persistent stigmatizing attitudes toward people who stutter among health sciences students, with marked disparities across disciplines. Targeted curricular interventions are warranted to address misconceptions about people who stutter.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.