ArticleBMC oral health2026
Apical anatomy of primary molar root canals: a micro-Ct study.
Article in BMC oral health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo investigate, using micro-computed tomography (micro-CT), the apical anatomy of mandibular second primary molar roots in Egyptian children, with emphasis on the spatial relationship between the apical foramen and the anatomic apex, and the morphology and dimensions of the root canal at the apical foramen level. MATERIALS AND
methodsFifty extracted human mandibular second primary molars (150 canals: 50 distal, 50 mesiobuccal, 50 mesiolingual) with complete root length and minimal resorption were scanned using high-resolution micro-CT (15.24 μm voxel size). The distance between the apical foramen and the apex, canal major diameter, and roundness at the foramen level were measured using CTAn software. Descriptive statistics were calculated, and exploratory canal-type comparisons were performed using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey post-hoc tests. (α = 0.05).
resultsThe apical foramen did not coincide with the anatomic apex in any canal. The mean apex-to-foramen distance was 0.57 ± 0.44 mm. Mean apical canal diameter was 0.63 ± 0.24 mm and mean roundness was 0.48 ± 0.17, indicating predominantly oval canal shapes. The overall comparison suggested variation in apex-to-foramen distance among canal types (p = 0.040), but post-hoc comparisons did not confirm statistically significant pairwise differences between individual canal types. Distal canals exhibited significantly larger diameters than both mesial canals (p < 0.05), whereas the difference between mesiobuccal and mesiolingual canals was not significant. Roundness did not differ significantly among canal types (p = 0.079).
conclusionsIn Egyptian children, the apical foramen of mandibular second primary molar is consistently offset from the anatomic apex. The distal canals demonstrated the largest major canal diameter at the apical foramen level. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Because the apical foramen rarely coincides with the apex and complete mechanical enlargement to the true apical diameter is often clinically unrealistic, pediatric endodontic treatment should prioritize accurate working-length determination (e.g., electronic apex locators) and combine conservative shaping with effective chemical disinfection to optimize apical cleaning while preserving root integrity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.