Trial reportBMC medical education2026
Effectiveness of an MDT-CDIO integrated teaching model in orthopedic clinical education: a controlled study.
Trial report in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundOrthopedic clinical education requires the integration of theoretical knowledge, practical skills, and multidisciplinary clinical decision-making. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a multidisciplinary team (MDT)-integrated Conceive-Design-Implement-Operate (CDIO) teaching model in orthopedic clinical education.
methodsIn this prospective randomized controlled study, 60 orthopedic interns at Lanzhou University Second Hospital, enrolled between March and August 2024, were randomly assigned to either an experimental group (n = 30) or a control group (n = 30). The experimental group received orthopedic instruction based on the MDT-CDIO model, whereas the control group received traditional teaching. Teaching effectiveness was evaluated after the instructional intervention using theoretical examinations, practical skills assessments, and structured questionnaires.
resultsThe experimental group achieved significantly higher scores than the control group in the theoretical assessment (47.23 ± 0.72 vs. 45.40 ± 1.16), practical assessment (46.03 ± 0.76 vs. 44.63 ± 0.89), and overall performance (93.18 ± 1.00 vs. 90.03 ± 1.37; all P < 0.001). In the questionnaire assessment, the experimental group also reported significantly higher scores across all evaluated dimensions than the control group (all P < 0.001).
conclusionsThe MDT-CDIO integrated teaching model appears to be a valuable approach for orthopedic clinical education and may improve students' learning outcomes, clinical practice skills, and perceived educational experience. Further large-scale, multicenter studies are warranted to validate its educational value and generalizability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42458436What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.