ArticleBMC public health2026
Sex and occupational differences in long COVID prevalence among healthcare workers: a multicentre registry-based study in three Spanish hospitals.
Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimsTo estimate the prevalence of long COVID identified through hospital registry data and examine associated occupational and demographic factors among healthcare workers (HCWs) in Spain.
methodsA multicentre study was conducted between 2020 and 2023 in three Spanish hospitals (Madrid, n = 1; Barcelona, n = 2). Long COVID prevalence and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated overall and by sex, age group, and occupational category. Associations between long COVID and occupational category were assessed using Poisson regression models with robust variance, stratified by sex and hospital, and adjusted by age and occupation.
resultsRegistry data included 8,439 HCWs. Long COVID prevalence ranged from 3.0% to 5.0% and increased with age, with an adjusted prevalence ratio (PR) increase of 3-9% per year. Occupational differences were more pronounced among men. In University Hospital Ramon y Cajal, male nurses (PR 2.56; 95% CI 1.13-5.81) and other HCWs (PR 3.67; 95% CI 1.12-12.08) had higher prevalence compared with physicians. In Hospital Parc Tauli, male nurse assistants (PR 20.33; 95% CI 3.64-113.42) and support staff (PR 8.30; 95% CI 1.46-47.19) showed markedly elevated prevalence, although confidence intervals were wide. Among women, occupational associations were weaker and less consistent. Overall sex differences were modest, but sex modified the association between occupational role and long COVID prevalence.
conclusionsLong COVID affected approximately 3-5% of HCWs across participating hospitals. Occupational differences in long COVID prevalence were observed, although estimates varied across centres. These findings highlight the importance of occupational health surveillance and follow-up strategies that consider both occupational role and potential sex-specific patterns.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42458402What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.