Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42458386›Full record

Trial reportBMC oral health2026

Effect of photobiomodulation therapy on wound healing and post-extraction pain management of primary molars: a randomized controlled clinical trial.

Rowan E Salem, Niveen S Bakry, Reham S Soliman

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC oral health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07033403 (Effect of Low-Level Laser Therapy on Wound Healing and Post-extraction Pain Management of Primary Molars.), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07033403 nacompletednot on this map

Effect of Low-Level Laser Therapy on Wound Healing and Post-extraction Pain Management of Primary Molars. (a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial)

TypeinterventionalSponsorAlexandria UniversityRan2025 to 2025Enrolled18ConditionsPost-extraction Pain (PEP), Wound HealingArmsLow Level Laser Therapy, Placebo plus Treatment As Usual
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Rowan E SalemPediatric Dentistry and Dental Public Health Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, 32 Champollion St. Azarita, Alexandria, 21525, Egypt. rowanezz24@gmail.com.
Niveen S BakryPediatric Dentistry and Dental Public Health Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, 32 Champollion St. Azarita, Alexandria, 21525, Egypt.
Reham S SolimanPediatric Dentistry and Dental Public Health Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, 32 Champollion St. Azarita, Alexandria, 21525, Egypt.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn pediatric patients, tooth extraction frequently results in unpleasant postoperative complications, including pain, inflammation, and bleeding. These painful experiences contribute to a child's anxiety, which may reduce his compliance with subsequent dental treatments. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of photobiomodulation therapy (PBMT) as an adjunctive treatment to enhance wound healing and manage post-extraction pain in children. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis was a double-blind, split-mouth, randomized controlled clinical trial. A total of 18 children with a mean age of 6.5 years were included; each child had one primary molar bilaterally indicated for extraction. Eligible sides were randomly assigned to either the test group (n = 18) receiving PBMT using a diode laser of wavelength 660 nm, an output power of 100 mW, and an application duration of 60 s (total energy of 6 J), or to the control group (n = 18) (placebo treatment). A one-week interval was implemented between the extraction of the first and contralateral side as a washout period to optimize post-operative comfort and function. Both groups received post-extraction instructions. Primary outcomes included wound healing, assessed by Landry, Turnbull, and Howley wound healing index, and post-extraction pain, monitored over one week using a self-reported questionnaire assessing pain, discomfort, analgesic consumption, daily activities, and jaw-function impairment. Data were analyzed using the Wilcoxon signed-ranks test, and McNemar test, with significance defined as p < 0.05.

resultsAt day 7, the test group demonstrated significantly superior wound healing scores (Median: 5.00) compared to the placebo group (Median: 4.00) (P = 0.002*). Furthermore, PBMT significantly reduced the subjective feeling of discomfort on the first evening (P = 0.02*). Over the one-week follow-up, the test group showed no analgesic consumption compared to 33.3% in the placebo group (P = 0.03*). It also reported significantly less difficulty with chewing on the extraction site, chewing soft food, and difficulty with taking a big bite compared to the placebo group; with percentages (38.9% vs.88.9%, P = 0.004*), (0% vs.33.3%, P = 0.03*), and (33.3% vs.72.2%, P = 0.04*), respectively.

conclusionPhotobiomodulation therapy is an effective adjunctive treatment following primary mandibular molar extraction. It significantly accelerates wound healing, reduces discomfort, and improves functional recovery by significantly reducing the need for post-operative analgesics.

trial registrationThis study was prospectively registered on March 6, 2025 (Trial registration number: NCT07033403 ).

Indexed as

Low-Level Light TherapyMolarPostoperative PainTooth, DeciduousTooth ExtractionWound HealingChildDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansLasers, SemiconductorMalePain MeasurementTreatment OutcomePain assessmentPhotobiomodulation therapy (PBMT)Tooth extractionWound healing

Identifiers

PMID42458386
PMCPMC13371656

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.