Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42458344›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2026

Towards precision medicine in placenta accreta spectrum: results from a survey-based evaluation of interactive academic international webinars.

Albaro Jose Nieto-Calvache, Jose Miguel Palacios-Jaraquemada, Karin A Fox, Ahmed M Hussein, Hiba J Mustafa, Amir A Shamshirsaz, Rozi A Aryananda, Conrado M Coutinho, Egle Savukyne, Helena C Bartels and 4 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Albaro Jose Nieto-Calvache *Departamento de Ginecología y Obstetricia, Fundación Valle del Lili, Clínica de Espectro de Acretismo Placentario, Cra 98 No. 18-49, Cali, 760032, Colombia. albaro.nieto@fvl.org.co.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5639-9127
Jose Miguel Palacios-JaraquemadaHospital Universitario CEMIC, Buenos Aires, Argentina.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5240-5320
Karin A FoxUniversity of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, Galveston, TX, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8405-772X
Ahmed M HusseinDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.
Hiba J MustafaDivision of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, The Fetal Center at Riley Children's and Indiana University Health, Indiana University School of Medicine, Riley Children's Hospital, Indianapolis, IN, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5611-1231
Amir A ShamshirsazDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, TX, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5914-4752
Rozi A Aryananda *Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Airlangga, Dr. Soetomo General Academic Hospital, Surabaya, Indonesia. rozi.odi@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6674-7682
Conrado M CoutinhoDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1966-0466
Egle SavukyneDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical Academy, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5384-0738
Helena C BartelsDepartment of UCD Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, University College Dublin, National Maternity Hospital, Dublin 2, Ireland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6470-9364
Maria Alejandra Suarez-ReveloCentro de Investigaciones Clínicas, Fundación Valle del Lili, Cali, Colombia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5708-9398
Yalda AfsharDivision of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3807-7022
Eric JauniauxFaculty of Population Health Sciences, EGA Institute for Women's Health, University College London (UCL), London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0925-7737
PAS Topography Official Working Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPlacenta accreta spectrum (PAS) has emerged as a pressing global health concern as cesarean delivery rates continue to rise. Once regarded primarily as a placental disorder, PAS is now understood as an abnormal implantation process occurring within uterine scars. Although cesarean hysterectomy remains the predominant management strategy, growing evidence suggests that individualized, uterine-sparing approaches may reduce morbidity and better align with patient preferences. Traditional histopathologic classifications neither correlate with prenatal imaging findings nor reflect surgical complexity, thereby limiting their clinical utility. The PAS topographic classification, developed from intraoperative observations, offers a practical framework for surgical staging and guides patient-specific management strategies. Standardized prenatal ultrasound can anticipate surgical challenges and facilitate preoperative counseling. Despite this, few hospitals currently use this classification.

methodsThis study qualitatively evaluated the impact of collaborative virtual educational activities designed to disseminate the concepts underlying the topographic classification on the surgical practice of PAS teams. Over a six-month period in 2024, interactive weekly webinars were conducted to discuss the evolving concepts in PAS that justify a shift toward precision medicine. Six months after the webinars concluded, a structured survey documented participants' perceptions of the impact of these sessions on the management of their PAS patients.

resultsA total of 112 invitations to participate in the survey were sent, and 91 responses were received (response rate: 81.2%). Among respondents, 97% (n = 88) reported that participation in the virtual academic discussions led to some change in their clinical practice. Thirty-four participants (37.4%) indicated that, following the webinars, they felt more confident proposing modifications to the management of patients at risk for PAS within their institutions. Participants reported that following the virtual academic discussions, they intended to use ultrasonographic evaluation to plan surgery (13 participants, 14.2%), implement individualized management based on topographic classification (18 participants, 19.8%), perform bladder dissection prior to fetal delivery in order to confirm placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) and assess its topography before selecting the appropriate treatment approach (8 participants, 8.8%).

conclusionsVirtual academic meetings designed to disseminate the PAS topographic classification fostered global collaboration, improved clinical practice, and enhanced mutual learning among PAS teams. Beyond technology, respectful, interactive discussions created a psychologically safe learning environment. Teleconferencing proved invaluable for education, research, and quality improvement, with continued support from professional societies essential for sustained progress.

Indexed as

ObstetricsPlacenta AccretaPrecision MedicineCesarean SectionFemaleHumansHysterectomyPregnancySurveys and QuestionnairesUltrasonography, PrenatalMultidisciplinary teamsPlacenta accreta spectrumPrecision medicineSurgical trainingTele-educationTopographic classificationUterine-sparing surgeryVirtual collaboration

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.