SynthesisBMC psychiatry2026
Comparative effectiveness and dose-response relationships of exercise for depressive symptoms in children and adolescents: a Bayesian network meta-analysis.
Synthesis in BMC psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDepression in children and adolescents is a growing public health concern with lasting effects on mental and physical health. Exercise is a promising strategy for prevention and treatment; however, the comparative effectiveness of different exercise types and their doses response remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of different exercise types on depressive symptoms and to explore their dose-response relationships using a network meta-analysis.
methodsSix databases (APA PsycInfo, Cochrane Library, Embase, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science) were systematically searched, supplemented by Google Scholar and citation tracking. Randomized controlled trials involving exercise interventions in children and adolescents were included. Risk of bias was assessed using the Revised Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. Bayesian network meta-analyses and dose-response analyses were conducted using random-effects models.
resultsA total of 41 trials with 4,563 participants were included. Mind-body exercise (MBE) was associated with the largest estimated reduction in depressive symptoms (SMD = - 1.46, 95% CrI: -2.00 to - 0.88), followed by resistance training (SMD = - 0.90, 95% CrI: -1.68 to - 0.14), aerobic exercise (AE; SMD = - 0.80, 95% CrI: -1.20 to - 0.43), interval training (SMD = - 0.60, 95% CrI: -1.43 to 0.24), and combined aerobic exercise and resistance training (AE + RT; SMD = - 0.54, 95% CrI: -1.24 to 0.13). Subgroup analyses suggested relatively larger estimated effects for AE in clinical populations and MBE in subclinical and healthy populations. Age-related differences were also observed, with AE showing relatively larger estimated effects in children and MBE in adolescents. A nonlinear U-shaped dose-response relationship was identified, with the greatest estimated effects occurring at 947 MET-min/week. Dose-response patterns varied across types, ranging from 690 MET-min/week for AE + RT to 1,130 MET-min/week for MBE.
conclusionsExercise appears to be associated with reductions in depressive symptoms in children and adolescents, although the magnitude of benefit may vary by exercise type and dose. The primary, subgroup and dose-response findings should be interpreted cautiously because of substantial between-study heterogeneity, residual uncertainty, and the overall low-to-moderate certainty of the evidence. Further high-quality studies are needed to strengthen the evidence base, confirm subgroup and dose-response findings, and assess long-term sustainability. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.