Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42458335›Full record

ArticleBMC pediatrics2026

The role of bullying victimization in youth suicide: A scoping review of empirical evidence.

Anne C Frederiks-Franssen, Rozemarijn van der Ploeg, Antje Janshen, Saskia Mérelle, Diana D van Bergen

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Anne C Frederiks-FranssenDepartment of Pedagogy and Educational Sciences, Faculty of Behavioural and Social Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands. a.c.franssen@rug.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-8384-2206
Rozemarijn van der PloegDepartment of Pedagogy and Educational Sciences, Faculty of Behavioural and Social Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Antje JanshenDepartment of Clinical Psychology and Experimental Psychopathology, Faculty of Behavioural and Social Sciences, University in Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Saskia MérelleResearch Department, 113 Suicide Prevention, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Diana D van BergenDepartment of Pedagogy and Educational Sciences, Faculty of Behavioural and Social Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhile bullying victimization is a well-established risk factor for suicidal ideation and nonfatal suicide attempts among young people, its role in suicide deaths remains poorly understood. This scoping review synthesizes empirical evidence on the prevalence and role of bullying victimization among children and adolescents who died by suicide.

methodsFollowing PRISMA guidelines, peer-reviewed empirical studies were included if they examined bullying victimization during childhood or adolescence (≤ 21 years) among individuals who died by suicide. Searches were conducted across seven databases in October 2023 and October 2025. Of the 4,233 screened records, 32 studies met the inclusion criteria after full-text review and quality appraisal using the QUIPS and CASP tools. The included studies employed record-based (60%), qualitative narrative (28%), longitudinal cohort (6%), and online ethnographic (6%) designs.

resultsAmong studies that systematically assessed bullying victimization, 29-55% reported its presence in the lives of deceased youth, compared with 0.1-22% in studies where bullying was documented only when spontaneously mentioned by informants. Record-based studies indicated that bullying victimization was more frequently documented among females, younger adolescents, and LGBTQ+ youth. Longitudinal cohort studies demonstrated that childhood bullying victimization increased the risk of suicide in adulthood, even after adjusting for individual and familial characteristics, although effect sizes were modest. Qualitative studies, often employing psychosocial autopsy methods, described bullying victimization as a persistent psychosocial stressor embedded within broader constellations of adversity, contributing to feelings of sadness, entrapment, and lack of belongingness. Online ethnographic studies found that hostile audience responses during live-streamed suicides function as cyberbullying and may exacerbate humiliation and hopelessness during acute crises.

conclusionsBullying victimization is an important yet understudied risk factor in youth suicide. Across study designs, it emerged as a long-term vulnerability of suicide embedded within complex psychosocial interactions. However, methodological limitations and inconsistent assessment constrain firm conclusions and calls for systematic, theory-driven, and technologically informed research to clarify the contribution of bullying victimization to suicide risk across development.

Indexed as

BullyingCrime VictimsSuicideAdolescentChildHumansRisk FactorsBullying victimizationCyberbullyingSuicide risk factorsYouth suicide

Identifiers

PMID42458335
PMCPMC13656710

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.