ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2026
Development of a discrete choice experiment design to explore how patient characteristics influence preferred fixation method in total hip replacement in the UK.
Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCurrently it is unclear how patient characteristics influence orthopaedic surgeons' decision-making in choice of implant and fixation. The aim of this study was to develop a discrete choice experiment (DCE) design to explore how patient characteristics influence surgeons' choices of implant fixation in total hip replacement (THR) in a national survey in the UK.
methodsWe followed a three-stage process to develop the DCE design. In stage 1, we used evidence from a literature review, expert panel of five surgeons, and Think-Aloud interviews with two surgeons to develop attributes and levels to describe patient profiles. In the stage 2, we developed a D-efficient experimental design for the survey. In stage 3, we pre-tested the survey using cognitive de-briefing with three surgeons and piloted the survey with ten surgeons.
resultsFinal attributes and levels were: age (55,65,75,85 years), sex (female, male), medical condition measured by ASA grade and BMI (3 levels: ASA III and BMI is ≥ 40; ASA III and BMI <40; ASA I or II and BMI < 40), patients' expected physical activity level after the surgery including sports, everyday activities and employment (mostly inactive, moderately active, very active), and surgeons' perception of the risk of periprosthetic fracture (high risk: yes, no). We generated an efficient experimental design with 40 patient profiles divided into 4 blocks of 10 profiles to be randomly distributed across respondents. Pre-test of the survey with cognitive debriefing confirmed the feasibility of the DCE task.
conclusionWe co-developed a DCE design with orthopaedic surgeons to explore how patient characteristics influence THR fixation methods in a survey among UK orthopaedic surgeons. Results of the DCE will inform 1) the design of a large randomised controlled trial (HIPPY) that aims to find out which hip implant fixation (cemented, uncemented, or hybrid) is the most effective and cost-effective for patients aged under 70 years, undergoing primary elective THR and 2) the implementation strategy of trial findings into clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.