ArticleBMC pediatrics2026
Real-world chest radiograph findings and clinical consequences in preschool children with recurrent wheezing.
Article in BMC pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeRecurrent wheezing in young children often prompts chest X-rays (CXRs) during diagnostic evaluation, despite limited evidence supporting their clinical utility. This study aimed to assess whether CXRs provide diagnostic or therapeutic benefit in children under five years of age with recurrent wheezing.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective review of 271 children under five years of age who presented with recurrent wheezing to a pediatric pulmonology outpatient clinic at the University Hospital of Cologne, Germany, between 2010 and 2022. All included children underwent CXR as part of their diagnostic workup. Data on clinical characteristics, CXR findings, and downstream clinical decisions were analyzed.
resultsFurther diagnostic workup was initiated in only 1% of cases, and no changes in diagnosis or treatment were documented. Despite these limited clinical consequences, abnormal CXR findings were reported in 73% of cases. The most frequent abnormality was peribronchial cuffing (35%). Most clinical parameters-including age, sex, prematurity, and atopic conditions-were not associated with abnormal CXR findings and therefore did not identify a subgroup of children who might benefit from selective imaging. Elevated blood eosinophil counts (≥ 150/µL, p = 0.023) were the only factor associated with abnormal CXR findings.
conclusionIn this real-world cohort of preschool children with recurrent wheezing, abnormal chest radiograph findings were frequent but largely nonspecific and rarely led to changes in diagnosis or clinical management. The radiographic patterns observed suggest the presence of underlying lower airway inflammation even outside of acute episodes. These findings add empirical evidence that is consistent with current recommendations advocating a clinically driven rather than routine use of chest radiography in preschool children with recurrent wheezing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.