Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42458205›Full record

ArticleThe oncologist2026

Fertility treatment using assisted reproductive technology during immune checkpoint inhibition: report of two cases.

Keri Tomechko, Tali Azenkot, Deirdre A Conway, Sandip Pravin Patel, H Irene Su

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in The oncologist, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Keri TomechkoSchool of Medicine, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, 92093, United States.
Tali AzenkotMoores Cancer Center, University of California, San Diego, CA, 92037, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-3329-6381
Deirdre A ConwayUtah Fertility Center, Utah, United States.
Sandip Pravin PatelMoores Cancer Center, University of California, San Diego, CA, 92037, United States.
H Irene SuMoores Cancer Center, University of California, San Diego, CA, 92037, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There are limited data to guide fertility counseling for patients on prolonged immune checkpoint inhibition. Concerns include potential teratogenicity, decline in ovarian reserve and spermatogenesis, and endocrine immune-related adverse events such as hypophysitis. As indications for checkpoint inhibition expand, an increasing number of reproductive-aged patients face fertility-related decisions around active therapy. We present two patient cases, one male and one female, who used assisted reproductive technology to support family building during maintenance immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy. A female lung cancer survivor underwent in vitro fertilization and froze six euploid blastocyst embryos for gestational surrogacy. A male gastroesophageal junction cancer survivor and his female partner underwent in vitro fertilization followed by a medicated intrauterine insemination cycle to conceive healthy fraternal twins. While prospective data are needed, this case series supports the feasibility of fertility treatment during checkpoint inhibitor therapy and highlights remaining clinical questions regarding this important aspect of cancer survivorship.

Indexed as

Fertility PreservationImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsLung NeoplasmsReproductive Techniques, AssistedAdultFemaleHumansMalePregnancyImmune Checkpoint Inhibitorsimmune checkpoint inhibitorimmune-related adverse eventoncofertilitysolid tumorsurvivorship

Identifiers

PMID42458205
PMCPMC13387161

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.