ArticleIrish journal of medical science2026
What should medical students learn in immunology? Developing a consensus-based curriculum framework for a spiral medical curriculum.
Article in Irish journal of medical science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundImmunology is the foundation for modern medical practice across infection, allergy, autoimmunity, transplantation, and cancer, yet is widely perceived by undergraduate medical students as being complex and difficult to learn. Curricular reform, including the adoption of integrated and spiral models, presents opportunities to improve learning through repeated exposure and clinical contextualisation, but also risks content dilution, fragmented sequencing, and reduced disciplinary coherence. The aim of this study was to develop a consensus-based framework defining core immunology content and guiding principles for implementation within a spiral undergraduate medical curriculum.
methodsA three-phase consensus development process involving faculty (Phase 1 questionnaire), a Curriculum Development Panel (Phase 2 structured discussion), and medical alumni (Phase 3 questionnaire) was used. Outputs were synthesised into a curriculum framework comprising core immunology content domains, guiding principles for sequencing and depth, and operational guidance ('Dos and Don'ts') for implementation in a spiral curriculum.
resultsStakeholders agreed a set of core immunology content domains appropriate for undergraduate medicine and endorsed guiding principles emphasising early conceptual grounding, progressive clinical application, limiting excessive molecular detail in early years, and aligning content with assessment. Alumni responses validated the perceived importance of clinical contextualisation and staged progression of expected knowledge from early medical school to graduation.
conclusionThis consensus-derived framework provides practical guidance for curriculum planners and clinician-educators implementing immunology teaching within integrated spiral programmes. Although developed within one institutional reform context, it is articulated at the level of domains and guiding principles to support adaptation for use across undergraduate medical curricula.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42458177What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.