Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42458130›Full record

SynthesisNeurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology2026

Creative thinking in Parkinson's disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Laura Colautti, Sara Magenes, Francesco Pagnini, Maria Caterina Silveri, Anna Rita Giovagnoli, Alessandro Antonietti

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Laura ColauttiDepartment of Psychology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo A. Gemelli, 1, 20123, Milan, Italy. laura.colautti1@unicatt.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7803-3721
Sara MagenesDepartment of Psychology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo A. Gemelli, 1, 20123, Milan, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8019-4762
Francesco PagniniDepartment of Psychology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo A. Gemelli, 1, 20123, Milan, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1612-4211
Maria Caterina SilveriDepartment of Psychology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo A. Gemelli, 1, 20123, Milan, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0019-6838
Anna Rita GiovagnoliFondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milan, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5719-0998
Alessandro AntoniettiDepartment of Psychology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo A. Gemelli, 1, 20123, Milan, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7212-8076

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCreativity in Parkinson's disease (PD) has aroused research interest due to its neurological underpinnings, which involve brain regions crucial for creative and divergent thinking (a core-process of creative thinking), and because of some patients who displayed an increased artistic drive following dopaminergic treatment. From a cognitive point of view, creative thinking underlies several cognitive abilities, such as executive functions and memory. Therefore, a better understanding of whether it is increased (or, at least, preserved) in PD patients can provide useful insights for sustaining cognitive functioning. The aim of the present study was to investigate whether PD patients regularly assuming dopaminergic medications present higher divergent thinking skills than healthy controls.

methodsA meta-analysis was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines to provide a statistical synthesis of the studies. Study quality was assessed using the QUADAS -2 tool.

resultsTen studies were included in the meta-analysis, which indicated the absence of significant differences between PD patients and healthy controls in tasks assessing divergent thinking (Cohen's d = -0,095 (95% CI: -0,308, 0,118)).

conclusionsSuch findings support the notion that divergent thinking can be spared by the disease, maybe constituting a possible resource for patients' cognitive functioning, as it involves those cognitive abilities that can compensate impairments in PD. Clinical implications and guidance to further studies and interventions to support PD patients' cognition were discussed.

Indexed as

CreativityParkinson DiseaseThinkingHumansCognitionCreativityDivergent thinkingDopamineExecutive functionsParkinson’s disease

Identifiers

PMID42458130
PMCPMC13372961

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.