ArticleCerebellum (London, England)2026
The Cerebellar Connectome.
Article in Cerebellum (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The cerebellum, long known for its role in motor control, has increasingly been implicated in cognitive and affective functions. Despite this broadened perspective, its connectivity remains undercharacterized relative to the cerebral cortex. Here, we present the first comprehensive cerebellar connectome analysis derived from a large-scale, meta-analytic database of over 7,800 high-resolution tract-tracing studies in the rat brain. Leveraging the neuroVIISAS framework, we constructed a directionally weighted, hierarchically organized cerebellar subnetwork integrating both intrinsic and extrinsic connections, including lateralization and interhemispheric projections. Our methodological pipeline involved region expansion, graph-theoretical filtering, and systematic edge weighting by anatomical significance. The resulting network, encompassing 862 regions and over 21,000 edges, was analyzed across multiple topological scales. Mesoscale analysis revealed hallmark properties of small-world and scale-free networks, while motif and modularity analyses identified non-random, functionally coherent microcircuits and subsystems. Local connectome metrics uncovered key integrative hubs-especially within brainstem-cerebellar loops-and exposed gradients of modularity, controllability, and vulnerability. A novel vulnerability analysis showed that the removal of high-significance edges leads to rapid and irregular degradation of clustering in the empirical network, in contrast to the robustness of rewired surrogate models. This indicates the presence of structurally privileged bottlenecks essential for cerebellar integration. Our results collectively highlight the cerebellum's dual design: functionally specialized yet structurally efficient, with both local modularity and long-range integration. This study establishes a robust foundation for future multimodal, dynamic, and cross-species connectomic research. Integrating empirical data on neuronal dynamics, synaptic plasticity, and gene expression will be essential to fully realize the translational potential of cerebellar network models in both health and disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.